Related Topics: Enemies; Der Don; More Human Rights For More Human Beings

This guy actually believes that just because he was president for a few years, all of our country's secret documents belong to him.
They never did belong him.

The president is not a king.
He is an elected servant of the American people,
permitted to wield a certain amount of power
for a limited time
on our behalf.

And he isn't even president anymore.

Now, of course, he says the election was stolen. But his so-called evidence has not been able to stand up in court, and the arguments he is making are a total perversion of our Constitution.
And he knows that. If he didn't, he wouldn't have tried to take over our government by force in January 2021.
In this nation we believe that all human beings are created equal and endowed by their creator (not the supreme court) with certain unalienable rights.

In a land of sovereign citizens, anyone who, for any period of time, is permitted extra privileges over and above the equal rights of all human beings is accountable for their actions while possessing those privileges.
If he committed crimes while he was president, or even if he just refused to do the job we elected him to do, he must pay the price for his actions and his failures.
Ever since Richard Nixon got away with his crimes, we have had this thing upside down.
We the people are the boss.
Our president, at all elected officials, work for us.
Far from being above the law, they need to be held to a higher standard than average citizens.

And still this Don thinks he should be king.

We need to send a clear message in this election, and probably also in the one in 2024, that our elected officials work for us. We choose them in free and fair elections and we can kick them out anytime we want.
This government (and all of its documents and all of its powers) belongs to us.
And if they commit crimes or abuse the power which we have lent them they will pay a very severe price for violating our trust.

Now……you may not agree with what I've just said.
And, if you would prefer to live under a lying, cheating, kleptocratic dictatorship, vote for candidates who support the Don in October.

But if you are an American patriot who wants to keep the system that has brought the blessings of freedom and human rights to our citizens for the last 2 1/2 centuries
and keep finding ways to make it work better,
then please join me, and it do what ever is necessary – even if they try to stop you – to vote against anyone who supports the Don and his lies.

And it’s all Part Of Ronnie Rodeo’s Reactionary Rapepublican Revolution

It's not about defending the rights of a fetus, or anything else.
It's all about Restricting the Rights of Human Beings!
and not only women

So. Now if you are a woman your body doesn't even belong to you.

Are you all getting angry yet?

I have been screaming for 40 years about Ronnie Rodeo's Reactionary Rapepublican Revolution.
And about how he reversed course of American history,
reducing human rights and moving power and wealth to large corporations and aristocracies.

They already took away your right to a reasonably priced high-quality education.
They already took away your right to a minimum wage which can support a family on 40 hours a week.
They're working on taking way your right to vote.
---- And they're not going to stop!

Now some of you are going to say not all Republicans are bad.
Look at Susan Collins.
She was sure Der Don's nominees would never overturn Roe versus Wade.
Who the hell does she think she was kidding?
Or maybe she was kidding herself.
If so it's about time she up and quit that Rapepublican Party.

Now I don't know:
She may not really care about the right to bodily autonomy.
She may not even care about the right to vote,
if most people it's taken away from today are those who might not vote for her.

But let me tell you something:
unless her family somehow amasses billions in intergenerational wealth,
the Rapepublican Party which she empowers will make damn sure that her children and grandchildren have fewer human rights than she has enjoyed.
And that aught to make her angry.

Because no matter what she tries to believe;
This is not the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln,
or Dwight Eisenhower,
or even Nelson Rockefeller.

This is a revolutionary insurgency intentionally designed to reverse the course of American history.

And that ought to be enough to make any American angry.

You may feel safe if you still have the right to vote.
Or if you are able to own your own home.
Or if you still have access to affordable healthcare.
Or if you still believe that you will be able to provide a better life for your children and grandchildren.
But don't kid yourself!
They're going to take all of that away from you just like they have so many others.

It's time for all of us to get really angry.!

This country was built on the fundamental belief that we are all created with unalienable human rights.
They are trying to take away those rights.

This government was designed to be owned and operated by human beings.
Government of the people by the lawyers and lobbyists
for the corporations and aristocracies
is not what we are about.

So let's get angry!
And let's take action.

In spite of all their shenanigans, some of us are still allowed to vote.
The Rapepublicans have shown us clearly who they are.
We need to tell them we do not want what they are selling.

Counterrevolution now!

What are the characteristics of a successful Czar or great President? Czar Vlad is the most successful Czar in Russian history. And a major element of his success has been his creation of the worst American President.

Related Topics: Der Don, Other Enemies

This time I'd like to talk about the special relationship between Czar Vlad, the most successful Czar in Russian history.
and Der Don, the worst American president ever.


Before I talk about the relationship between these two individuals, I'd like to outline what I see as the characteristics of a successful Russian Czar and those of a good United States president.


A Czar is the absolute ruler of the Empire.
I think a successful Czar would have these three characteristics:
1.  he or she would command absolute unquestioned authority.
2.  The Czar would make the Russian people proud.
3.   a successful Czar would make the Russian people feel safe.
Traditionally this feeling of safety has been best achieved by
    * maintaining a strong military
    * and defeating the enemies of the Empire.


A good president is going to be a very different kind of leader.
The job is to administer, in a fair and just manner, the laws passed by the democratically elected legislature.


Three things I think we look for in a good president are:
1.  to defend freedom and advance human rights.
A characteristic of most of our greatest presidents is that when they left office more Americans were able to exercise more human rights than when they were inaugurated.
2.   bring the American people together.
3.  to make the American people feel safe.
But not, as a Czar would, by military spending and the imperial wars.
The American people feel safest when
there is a strong economy with opportunity for all
and when the world is place in which democracies, ours and others, are safe and can thrive.

These are two very different jobs.
Czar Vlad is very well suited to his job. Der Don, not so much.


Did you notice that out of the three characteristics of a successful Czar and one of those of a good president the one strong similarity is that both are expected to make their people feel safe?

What better way for Czar Vlad to make his people feel safe than to embarrass their greatest enemy, which had defeated the Soviet Union in the Cold War, by placing a Putin Puppet in the Presidency?


And since Der Don it is unfamiliar with democracy it was quite easy for Czar Vlad to coach him into behaving like a Czar.
Thus
1.  compromising American freedom, reducing human rights,
2.  dividing the American people,
2.  weakening our economy, and making the world much less safe for democracy.


Czar Vlad would make a terrible president of the United States, but I think he will go down in history as one of the greatest Russian Czar's.


And Der Don is without question the worst American president so far
and I hope there is never another like him.

Der Don does not seem to be familiar with the Constitution of The United States and our form of government. His primary frame of reference seems to be absolute monarchy. It is the governmental system which most closely resembles his approach to business management.

More of my thoughts about Der Don. Other enemies of Democracy and Progressionism.

This time I want to talk to you about monarchies.
And not the kind of wimpy constitutional monarchies that emerged in the 20th century, But bad old-fashioned authoritarian dynastic medieval European style monarchies.

Monarchy is an authoritarian form of government in which one person, usually a man, is vested with all the powers of government.
He decides what the law is,
He directs all the powers of coercion which enforce the law,
and He passes judgment on any subjects who he deems to have violated the law.

You notice I said subjects.
In a monarchy human beings are not citizens, they are subjects.
They are the property of the monarch in much the same way that a factory is the property of a Corporation in our economic system.
The concept of human rights is alien to monarchies.
But in order to sustain a monarchy, the monarch must secure the loyalty of his subjects.
This is generally done through a combination of coercion and propaganda.
The most successful monarchs tend to operate in very much the same way as cult leaders.

The monarchy is normally supported by other institutions within the society.
There is usually an aristocracy,
Aristocrats are subjects who have privileges granted to them by the monarch,
including wealth, status, and exemption from many of the more oppressive laws.
Members of this aristocracy are selected to fulfill bureaucratic functions within the governmental mechanisms. But they only serve at the pleasure of the monarch.

Monarchs hold on to their power and position for life.
If they share power at all it is usually with members of their immediate family.
Traditionally when a monarch dies, one of those family members inherits his power.

Monarchs traditionally justify their position and power by claiming that it has been bestowed by God.
Therefore they tend to ally themselves with prevailing religious institutions and the leaders thereof.
Most monarchs prefer to establish a state religion.
While they may not abolish other religions, they give preference to a specific religious institution from which they demand total support.
They usually declare that the founding principles and values of the nation are inextricably intertwined with the specific religion with the which the monarchy is allied.

One of the techniques which monarchs use to solidify their power is to exaggerate the danger of enemies both within and without.
The monarchs propaganda machine concocts an exaggerated description of the virtuous and loyal subjects
and contrasts that with the enemies of the state:
Evil, disloyal subjects
and grotesque subhuman citizens of other nations.
Emphasizing the imagined differences between us and them.
This is a belief system which I call exclusionism and I discuss it great length in some of my other videos. It is one of the many similarities between monarchs and cult leaders.

I could go on, but I hope this has stimulated your thinking and
stirred up recollections of history and civics lessons in your past
or even movies plays and television shows that depict monarchy.

But just looking at some of the characteristics of monarchy I've mentioned here,
does any of it sound familiar?
Does it look anything like the reality TV show has taken over our government?

If it does we know what we must do.
*  Declare loudly and aggressively our opposition to this change in our form of government.
*  Vote in November like our human rights and our independence are at stake.
Because they are.
*  And pledge to fight this tyranny, if necessary with our lives our fortunes and our sacred honor.